| Name | Shatterskull Minotaur  |
|---|---|
| Type | Creature — minotaur warrior |
| Description | This spell costs  less to cast for each creature in your party. (Your party consists of up to one each of Cleric, Rogue, Warrior, and Wizard.)
Haste |
| Flavor | "We just pay him and point him at problems." —Aro, Sea Gate adventurer |
| Artist | Aleksi Briclot |
| Set | Zendikar Rising #160 |
| Wallpaper |  download |
| Image |  download |
Tierlist
No Rank
Grade it yourself
Shatterskull Minotaur, Creature — minotaur warrior, designed by Aleksi Briclot first released in Sep, 2020 in the set Zendikar Rising.
A deck that focuses on assembling a diverse party of Cleric, Rogue, Warrior, and Wizard creatures would benefit the most from including Shatterskull Minotaur, as it can potentially be cast for a reduced cost or even for free. However, in a more competitive setting, other cards like Tazri, Beacon of Unity may offer more versatile party support and synergy, making them better choices for inclusion. Whether Shatterskull Minotaur sees play would depend on the specific strategy and synergy of the deck, as well as the overall power level of the format it's being played in.
09/25/20
An ability referring to the number of creatures in your party gets a number from zero to four. Such abilities never ask which creatures are in your party, and you never have to designate specific creatures as being in your party. You can’t choose to exclude creatures from this count to lower the number.
09/25/20
If a spell has a cost reduction based on the number of creatures in your party, no player may attempt to change that number after you begin to cast the spell but before you pay the cost.
09/25/20
To determine “the number of creatures in your party,” check whether you control a Cleric, whether you control a Rogue, whether you control a Warrior, and whether you control a Wizard. The number is the total number of those checks to which you answered yes. Each creature you control can be counted for only one of those checks.
Sign in and join the conversation
— Comments 0
, Reactions 1
Be the first to comment