Threads of Disloyalty
| Name | Threads of Disloyalty |
|---|---|
| Type | Enchantment — aura |
| Description | Enchant creature with mana value 2 or less You control enchanted creature. |
| Flavor | "Every thought is a string. You just have to find the right ones to pull." |
| Artist | Tyler Jacobson |
| Set | Signature Spellbook: Jace #8 |
| Wallpaper | |
| Image |
Tierlist
No Rank
Grade it yourself
About Threads of Disloyalty
Threads of Disloyalty, Enchantment — aura, designed by Tyler Jacobson first released in Jun, 2002 in the set Magic Online Promos and was printed exactly in 5 different ways.
This card would be beneficial in a control deck that aims to disrupt the opponent's strategy by taking control of key low-cost creatures. While Threads of Disloyalty is a solid choice for its mana cost and effect, a potentially better alternative could be Vedalken Shackles, which offers more flexibility in terms of the mana value of the creature it can target. However, Threads of Disloyalty could still see play in specific metagames where low-cost creatures are prevalent.
Rules
02/01/05
Threads of Disloyalty can’t target a creature with converted mana cost 3 or greater. If it somehow enchants a creature with converted mana cost 3 or greater, Threads of Disloyalty is put into the graveyard the next time state-based actions are checked.
02/01/05
Tokens usually have a converted mana cost of 0.
Frequently asked questions about Threads of Disloyalty
What type of card is Threads of Disloyalty?
Threads of Disloyalty is a Enchantment — aura card in Marvel Snap SNAP.
What does Threads of Disloyalty do?
Enchant creature with mana value 2 or less You control enchanted creature.
What set is Threads of Disloyalty from?
Threads of Disloyalty was first released in the set Magic Online Promos, illustrated by Tyler Jacobson.
Is Threads of Disloyalty legal to play?
Legality depends on the tournament format -- Threads of Disloyalty can be legal in some formats and banned or restricted in others. See the full breakdown per format in the Legality section above.

Reactions
0
0 Comments
Be the first to comment