| Name | Goblin Racketeer  |
|---|---|
| Type | Creature — goblin rogue |
| Description | Whenever Goblin Racketeer attacks, you may goad target creature defending player controls. (Until your next turn, that creature attacks each combat if able and attacks a player other than you if able.) |
| Flavor | "It, uh, fell off a cart?" |
| Artist | Zoltan Boros |
| Set | Conspiracy: Take the Crown #53 |
| Wallpaper |  download |
| Image |  download |
Tierlist
No Rank
Grade it yourself
Meta types
Legality between formats
Table of contents
About Goblin Racketeer
Goblin Racketeer, Creature — goblin rogue, designed by Zoltan Boros first released in Aug, 2016 in the set Conspiracy: Take the Crown.
A deck focusing on aggressive strategies and forcing opponents into unfavorable combat situations would benefit from including Goblin Racketeer. While it can be a fun and disruptive card to play in casual games, in more competitive settings, cards like Grenzo, Havoc Raiser or Krenko, Mob Boss might be better options for goblin-themed decks due to their stronger abilities and impact on the game. Overall, Goblin Racketeer could see play in more casual or themed decks, but may not be a top choice for highly competitive play.
Rules
08/23/16
Being goaded isn’t an ability the creature has. Once it’s been goaded, it must attack as detailed above even if it loses all abilities.
08/23/16
If a creature you control has been goaded by multiple opponents, it must attack one of your opponents that hasn’t goaded it, as that fulfills the maximum number of goad requirements. If a creature you control has been goaded by each of your opponents, you choose which opponent it attacks.
08/23/16
If, during a player’s declare attackers step, a creature that player controls that’s been goaded is tapped, is affected by a spell or ability that says it can’t attack, or hasn’t been under that player’s control continuously since the turn began (and doesn’t have haste), then it doesn’t attack. If there’s a cost associated with having a creature attack a player, its controller isn’t forced to pay that cost, so it doesn’t have to attack in that case either.
Sign in and join the conversation
— Comments 0
, Reactions 1
Be the first to comment